A few weeks ago I took my gran along to the Apple store in Leicester to show her an iPad.

My fingers danced across the shiny screen, I blitzed through folders full of photos to show her its capabilities, and urged her to hold it in her hands to feel how light it was.

“That’s all very well,” she said, “but why is it any better than my laptop?”

Skip forward a month or so and Prospect Leicestershire chairman Nick Carter sat before a panel of around 12 scrutinising councillors.

A jazzy promotional video was projected onto a screen.

A brochure was handed out which contained so many giant fonts it looked like it had been delivered direct from the large print section of the Pork Pie Library.

Even USB sticks were dished out to the assembled councillors. “What on earth is this?” muttered one elderly sage.

It was an Apple-style all singing, all dancing performance. But it wasn’t enough for Bill Boulter (Lib Dem, South Wigston).

“That’s all very well,  but I think other organisations can do your job cheaper.”

Ouch. But to be honest, it was the closest we came to any real scrutiny during this hour or so.

Dr Kevin Feltham (Con, Gartree) basted Nick with compliments about how “nimble” the agency was. Then he kept repeating it. The word lost its meaning for a second. Nimble is a word you’d use to describe a sprightly safari animal, not a development agency.

As Nick talked about Prospect, Dr Feltham responded with kind of happy groans and syrupy smile you’d make on slipping into a hot bath after an exhausting day.

Hyperactive Peter Lewis, (Con, Loughborough South West) did a little better. He enthusiastically tackled the issue of Prospect’s brochure having too many city pictures in it, and not enough county snaps. He also roasted the promotional video as pointless.

But it would have taken a fair amount of ineptitude to flail in front of this committee, and Nick never swam near any trouble.

When awkward issues were raised (why do most districts get very little in return for the £18k they throw into the pot each year) he stroked his facial hair and nodded earnestly before responding in-depth.

Chief executive David Hughes – wearing a dark orange tie which almost matched his tanned exterior – was able to take a back seat as he watched the chairman deal with each of the questions capably.

In fact, David looked so bored with the entire thing that his files and papers were piled up ready to go before the final question had been answered.

“Come back soon,” members of committee chimed, as the pair got up to leave.

But by then a couple of older councillors were already distracted, jabbing their shiny new USB sticks with a sense of bafflement.

What have you done in the past year?

That’s the question that will be put to Prospect Leicestershire chairman Nick Carter (below left) by the county council’s scrutiny panel on Wednesday.

The former Mercury editor will sit alongside Prospect chief executive David Hughes to outline the publicly-funded organisation’s plans for the future.

At a time of savage cuts to public spending, the question of whether it will duplicate the work of the new Local Enterprise Partnerships will surely arise.

But one issue I’d really like to see brought up is the issue of openness.

Despite being bankrolled by taxpayer cash (with a staff budget of £1 million) Prospect is keen to point out on its website that it is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act.

But, the website assures us, Prospect Leicestershire:

“…wishes to operate in a spirit of openness, and will be pleased to respond to information requests under our own Publication Scheme.”

So I lodged a ‘Spirit of Openness’ request on January 31 this year, asking for copies of executive credit card statements for the most recently available 12 month period.

More than five months on, I’m still waiting…

6PM UPDATE: Nick has been in touch to say the request will be chased up.