Leicester Mercury political correspondent
Posts tagged Barbara Potter
Hung out to dry
Sep 7th
Posted by David MacLean in Elected Mayor
Councillors said they had no power.
Now they’ve lost their voice.
It genuinely surprised me that two city councillors have been disciplined for their comments on capital punishment.
Two council members, elected by the people, have been censured and warned because they supported a viewpoint which – according to some research – a majority of the people support.
To quote Bill Hicks: “You are free to do as we tell you to.”
A week in review – elected mayoral edition
Nov 11th
Posted by David MacLean in Elected Mayor
The Lord Mayor admired the young couple sitting before him.
Richard and Stacie Newton were being given the prestigious honoured citizens award on Tuesday afternoon for their part in helping to close a neighbourhood drugs den.
Their inspiring story of standing up for community values struck a chord with him, and he was enjoying his time entertaining them in the parlour on Tuesday afternoon.
Council officials entered – cynics would say they’d chosen a time when he was at his most unguarded – asking him to give the nod to an emergency council meeting.
The emergency meeting would be used to mark the start of an attempt by Labour to ram through a last-minute consultation process in preparation for installing an all-powerful elected mayor next May.
These things are usually a formality. The officers must have fancied their chances. To an outside observer, it would look like he was being bounced.
But he wasn’t ready to accede to them. He did what any responsible mayor would have done.
“I’d like to see the constitution before deciding,” he said.
And that’s where the trouble began.
-
The previous evening, the city’s Labour councillors had met for their regular group meeting.
In essence, this group meeting is about as powerful as the monthly assembly of all councillors.
With a chunky majority in the chamber, what they say goes.
After a blog post by myself on the issue of elected mayors, and a feature on last Sunday’s politics show, anticipation had built for the vote on whether to have a directly elected leader of the city.
Whichever way the vote went would help shape the city’s political scene for years to come.
One cabinet member, Paul Westley, had already broken cover. He’d told the BBC he was against the idea – but leader Veejay Patel had made up his mind and pushed for consensus.
The vote was carried, but by a smaller margin than expected. Councillors who’d left the four-hour meeting early could have made the vote even closer.
Deputy leader Vi Dempster, Veejay’s right-hand woman, was one of more than ten councillors who voted against the plan.
All was not well. Things needed to be pushed through quickly.
-
It needn’t have been such a rush.
Many councils carried out and completed the consultation process months ago. Leicester City Council’s was a last minute rush job.
Why? Some claim former leader Ross Willmott put it on the back-burner for too long. But Veejay has been in office for nine months. Many don’t buy that line.
A proposal almost universally opposed by most party figures – save for Sir Peter Soulsby – just a few weeks ago was suddenly gaining support in the run-up to this week’s vote.
Why? Everything in politics happens for a reason. Whispers began that some sort of deal had been done.
-
Some have asked: “Why would Peter Soulsby want to be mayor of Leicester? He’s an MP is Parliament on a chunky salary.”
Because it would make him the second most powerful directly elected politician in the country, and the most powerful politician Leicester has ever had.
Expect an elected mayor’s salary to quickly rise, too. The workload is much more significant than that of council leader – an independent pay panel will no doubt find – further down the line, before hiking the salary.
-
To ram through a decision before the December 31 deadline, and avoid the plan biting the dust, a consultation must be carried out. It needs to be raised as an issue at three full council meetings before a decision can be made. The first to start the consultation, the second to hear the results, and the third to rubber-stamp any decision.
Colin Hall’s stance on the emergency meeting – he was still rightly or wrongly concerned about constitutional issues – was blocking the leadership’s attempt to start the consultation.
Without the meeting, the plans of the party’s influencers would be scuppered.
-
A brief word of background here. Colin Hall is one of the Labour councillors who is against the elected mayor idea.
In the past, he hasn’t seen eye-to-eye with Soulsby, the current favourite to win any mayoral election.
“He sees Soulsby as partly responsible for his years when he wasn’t on the council,” one of his colleagues told me.
-
The situation culminated with a day of arm-twisting on Thursday. Allies of Veejay say he had to step up and show leadership.
Whether he’s acted rightly or wrongly in the past 24 hours, no-one can argue that he showed leadership. He also showed a ruthless streak, which could come in handy during any mayoral election.
Formidable whip Barbara Potter was dispatched to persuaded the Lord Mayor to change his mind.
Those close to Veejay admitted that they could easily circumvent the mayor by asking four councillors to sign a document forcing a meeting to be held. But there was never any plan to do that. It would have been embarrassing and signalled a crippling weakness in Veejay’s authority.
“Every option is open if we don’t get our way on this.” one party high-flyer confided. Hours of silence then ensued.
-
At 4pm my mobile-phone buzzed with a text. “It’s all back on. Emergency meeting is on November 19. Now we’re moving…”
Labour in-fighting continues
Nov 8th
Posted by David MacLean in Leicester City Council
Just when you thought things were harmonious in the city’s ruling party, former cabinet member Andy Connelly and current Labour chief whip Barbara Potter have gone toe-to-toe on this blog this morning.
In the comments section of my previous post, Andy implied that Barbara had leaked emails to the Press. She replied in her usual robust way.
For ease of reference I’ve copied the comments below:
Barbara Potter: “Disclosing private and confidential Emails to the press! Before Members read them from the in trays
Glad all are members aren’t like the bad egg in this Tray. What ever Next?
Andy Connelly: “Yes, you must really stop doing that Barbara!”
Mr Mischief returns to save school laptops
Nov 7th
Posted by David MacLean in Leicester City Council
Secure in the knowledge that he’s got the Labour selection sealed for the forthcoming city elections next May, Ross Willmott is back on the warpath.
Angry that an election pledge of providing netbook access for schoolchildren looks to have been thrown further into doubt by chief whip Barbara Potter – “I thought that our whip was supposed to uphold policy not publicly dump it?” - he fired off an email to education supremo Vi Dempster. In response she claimed the Mercury report was incorrect, and urged him not to believe everything he read in the Press.
Don’t forget that the current proposed scheme has already been watered down from a bold pledge to provide netbook access to every school pupil in the city – to giving a bundle of netbooks to pupils at just ten schools. Plans are now on the table to reduce that even further to just five schools.
So next time Vi urges you not to believe everything you read in the papers, ask when you can start believing all of the headline pledges that appear in her party’s election literature.
-
Update: Spotted the following comment from Labour’s Patrick Kitterick amongst the website comments on our story:
Tory Cllr Michael Johnson is being utterly hypocritical. He is currently at a Children’s Conference in Manchester staying a the Midland Hotel. The Total Cost to Leicester Citizens of this is £1000. So it’s Jollies for Tory Councillors but no internet access for some of the most deprived children in Leicester? “All in it together” not for Cllr Johnson in his cushy hotel.
The city council fail whale
Mar 29th
Posted by David MacLean in Leicester City Council
I wrote a story in Saturday’s Mercury that Leicester City Council is considering banning Twitter in the council chamber.
It was sparked by a complaint from Labour chief whip Barbara Potter.
Councillor Potter, to her credit, didn’t shy away from defending her position when I called her late last week.
But my issue isn’t with Barbara; she’s the whip and it’s her job to keep members in line.
I want to know why Veejay Patel won’t rule it out and kill the issue stone dead as part of his era of openness.
At the very least it’s naive politics, because his vague response means the issue will run and run. Instead of playing down the influence of Twitter in city politics it elevates it.
What’s the betting that a record number of people – many of them Leicester Twitter users – tune into the next full council meeting?
I wonder if the council will release the web stats?
The sound of silence
Mar 23rd
Posted by David MacLean in Leicester City Council
Colin Hall is rarely lost for words – particularly on Twitter.
He raised a few eyebrows when he used his account to broadcast last week’s Labour AGM. But for the second round of selections he’s been carefully toeing the party line.
So what’s prompted him to turn over a new leaf? Could it be the recent installment of no-nonsense Barbara Potter as Labour chief whip, in place of laid-back Piara Singh Clair?
She’s a tough-talker, alright, and gave me the hairdryer treatment at Monday’s scrutiny meeting about a story in that day’s Mercury.
The fact that the story was entirely correct didn’t stop her trying to give me a stern dressing-down across the committee room.
Councillor Hall is right to be cautious…
Colin Hall scoops them all…
Mar 15th
Posted by David MacLean in Leicester City Council
Labour leadership night in Leicester, and what a serene affair it was too.
With a clever system of self-nomination, and a closing date well in advance of the meeting, you avoid nasty surprise challenges come party polling day.
Done and dusted in 60 minutes. I barely had time to finish a late night scotch egg and cup of coffee in the office before the Labour councillors were filing out.
I spoke to some councillors for their reaction, but we already had the results, of course, courtesy of Colin Hall‘s Twitter account. Keep on going like that and we’ll be out of a job…
Three contenders. Veejay Patel – front runner, Mary Draycott – the challenger, and Manish Sood – throwing his hat into the ring. In the end he got one vote. What on earth was he up to? I still can’t figure it out. Veejay won the day, and Mary put in a fairly respectable showing. There were two spoilt ballot papers. Wonder who.
Other party positions were dished out which have little relevance to those outside the party, but are interesting nonetheless.
Barbara Potter was nominated as chief whip. One councillor gave me a call after the meeting and growled: “One of the most outspoken critics of the council on issues like market policy and road conditions is suddenly in charge of maintaining order in the party and a united front. I can’t decide whether it’s genius or madness.”
Piara Singh Clair had dropped out of the chief whip race at the last minute. “Must have been offered a cabinet position,” winked one wag on leaving the meeting. We’ll wait and see. The cabinet will be selected on March 23.
One other point, it was confidently predicted by those closest to Coun Patel last month that he had 27 cast-iron votes in the bag. He ended up with 24.
So who are the trio that deserted him at the final hurdle, and why?